Table of Contents
If you are a manager, you may want to try this exercise. On the left-hand side of a blank sheet of paper write down the names of the people who report to you in descending order of productivity, the most productive at the top, the least productive at the bottom. On the right-hand side, write down the same names, but this time in descending order of “time you spend with them,” the most time at the top, the least time at the bottom. Now draw straight lines joining the names on the left with the appropriate names on the right.
Do your lines cross? They often do. Many managers find themselves spending the most time with their least productive people and the least time with their most productive people. On the surface, this would appear to be an eminently safe way for a manager to invest his time. After all, your best employees can already do the job. They don’t need you. But those few employees who are struggling? They need all the help you can give them. Without your support, they might not only fail as individuals, but they might also drag down the entire team.
“A motivated manpower is the most important thing.” ~ Dhirubhai Ambani
Effective Managers Do the Opposite
Investing in your strugglers appears wise, yet the most effective managers do the opposite. When they join the names, their lines are horizontal. They spend the most time with their most productive employees. They invest in their best. Why?
Because at heart they see their role very differently from the way most managers do. Most managers assume that the point of their role is either to control or to instruct. And, yes, if you see “control” as the core of the manager role, then it would certainly be productive to spend more time with your strugglers because they still need to be controlled. Likewise, if you think “instructing” is the essence of management, investing most in your strugglers makes similarly good sense because they still have so much to learn.
Turning Talent into Performance
But great managers do not place a premium on either control or instruction. Both have their place, particularly with novice employees, but they are not the core: they are too elementary, too static. For great managers, the core of their role is the catalyst role: turning talent into performance. So when they spend time with an employee, they are not fixing or correcting, or instructing. Instead, they are racking their brains, trying to figure out better and better ways to unleash that employee’s distinct talents:
- They strive to carve out a unique set of expectations that will stretch and focus on each particular individual.
- They try to highlight and perfect each person’s unique style. They draw his attention to it. They help him understand why it works for him and how to perfect it.
- And they plot how they, the manager, can run interference for each employee so that each can exercise his or her talents even more freely. As Robert T., a branch manager for a large brokerage house, explains: “My brokers don’t work for me. I work for them. If I can’t think up any new ideas to help my superstars, the least I can do is grease the administrative wheels so that nothing gets in their way.”
If this is how you see your role and what you are doing when you spend time with your people — setting unique expectations, highlighting and perfecting individual styles, running interference — you cannot help but be drawn toward your most talented employees. Talent is the multiplier. The more energy and attention you invest in it, the greater the yield. The time you spend with your best is, quite simply, your most productive time.
“No News” Kills Productive Behavior
You might have heard this proverb as “No news is good news”. The meaning is “without information to the contrary you can assume that all is well”. But this doesn’t hold true in the corporate world. Time away from your best people is alarmingly destructive. Graduates from the machismo school of management, with its strong motto “No news is good news,” would be surprised by just how destructive it is.
At its simplest, a manager’s job is to encourage people to do more of certain productive behaviors and less of other, unproductive behaviors. Machismo managers have forgotten that their reactions can significantly affect the behaviors, which gradually die out. They have forgotten that they are on the center stage always, whether they like it or not, they are sending signals that every employee hears.
Great managers haven’t forgotten. They remember that they are permanently center stage. In particular, they remember that the less attention they pay to the productive behaviors of their superstars, the less of those behaviors they will get. Since human beings are wired to need the attention of some kind, if they are not getting attention, they will tend, either subconsciously or consciously, to alter their behavior until they do.
Way Ahead
Therefore, as a manager, if you pay the most attention to your strugglers and ignore your stars, you can inadvertently alter the behaviors of your stars. Guided by your apparent indifference, your stars may start to do less of what made them stars in the first place and more of other kinds of behaviors that might net them some sort of reaction from you, good or bad. When you see your stars acting up, it is a sure sign that you have been paying attention to the wrong people and the wrong behaviors.
So try to keep this in mind: You are always on center stage. Your misplaced time and attention is not a neutral act. No news is never good news. No news kills the very behaviors you want to multiply.
In practical terms, then, great managers invest in their best because it is extremely productive to do so and actively destructive to do otherwise. During interviews, great managers were happy to explain the benefits in more conceptual terms. They shared that investing in their best was, first, the fairest thing to do; second, the best way to learn; and, third, the only way to stay focused on excellence. (Excerpt is from ‘First, Break All the Rules’ by Marcus Buckingham).
